#FF WORKS WINDOWS#

Gothic Book p.36 very sharp and pure forms of lancet trefoil used to decorate the lateral piers of the Apse of the Frari Gothic Book p.35 Door of the ‘Evangelist House’ compared with the belfry door of the Frari Gothic Book p.14 - repetition and complication of the flamboyant style in the belfry door of the Frari

Gothic Book p.6 ‘Flamboyant’ Stalls of the Frari, and reference to the Pacifico tomb Gothic Book p.4 Apse side aisles and transepts of Frari

Gothic Book p.2 - Frari nave and the ‘universal c moulding of Venice’ Works, 11.285 and 1 and 3 of the plate facing that page on tracery bars.īit Book p.37L tracery bars of sub arches of Frari campanile īit Book p.80L arches in cloister of Frari īit Book p.1w Frari cloister recalling the upper cloister of Ducal Palace ĭoor Book p.33 comparison between Frari and Ca d’Oro Works, 11.281-2 and reference to plate IX facing Works, 11.280 complete arch moulding of the apse of the Frari Works, 11.280 and the facing plate on archivolts Works, 11.270 and 12 of plate facing that page on Gothic jambs

#FF WORKS WINDOWS#

Works, 10.299 third order windows of the chapter house of Frari corresponding with the flank of Ducal Palace and therefore ‘of inestimable value in determining the date of the palace’ Works, 10.273 quatrefoils from apse Ruskin’s reward for uninteresting labour in the insights they provide into the Ducal Palace Works, 10.272ff, Works, 10.309, Works, 11.247f apse traceries the real root of the Ducal Palace Works, 9.169 arch masonry from two blocks Works, 9.133 trefoiled shaft with a capital made in Byzantine manner by Gothic craftsmen Published references in the Stones of Venice in addition to those referred to above: Doors Gothic Book p.14 Gothic Book p.37 Gothic Book p.38.Cloisters Bit Book p.80L Bit Book p.81 Bit Book p.82.generally Notebook M2 p.73 Nave, capitals and vaulting, Gothic Book pp.2-5.Apse, niches, Gothic Book p.36 Traceries Notebook M2 p.80 and Notebook M2 p.85 Doors, to Belfry, Notebook M p.151, external Notebook M p.44.Tombs in, Notebook M p.134 Notebook M p.154 Notebook M p.155 Notebook M p.156.FRARI Church of - Notebook M p.132, Notebook M p.44, Date of Notebook M2 p.9.In the index at Notebook M p.221, unusually including a reference to M2: The passages and subjects he picks out in his own indexes to the Notebooks, presumably those he considers the most important for his work, are: Giovanni e Paolo, considered by Ruskin to be even worse, do not appear in the Notebooks ( Works, 11.110ff). In Stones of Venice he goes on to single out the later Pesaro and Canova tombs as examples of bad taste, but these, like the Falier/Valier tombs in SS. The Frari, according to Ruskin, is the source of the best Gothic traceries of the Ducal Palace and it contains examples of the worst of the late Gothic of Bon. Through the Notebooks Ruskin uses examples from the Frari to illustrate his views about the development of Gothic and its degradation into the Gothic of what he calls ‘Bonism’ or Porta della Carta style. His account of the Frari is based on the assumption, set out most fully at Notebook M2 p.9, that the building he saw was essentially the building started in 1250, rather than its replacement started in1340.įor images see here, and for the interior here and the website of the Basilica and parish here. At Works, 11.379 Ruskin’s Venetian Index brings together his concluding judgments of the Frari and of its tombs. His views on their place in the architectural history of Venice are summarised at Works, 9.43. 27), and of its Dominican equivalent, SS Giovanni e Paolo, are set out at Works, 9.26ff. Ruskin’s views on the place in the religious history of Venice of the Franciscan church of Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari ( Nadali & Vianello (1999) Tav.

Ff works